Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:39

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Predator: Killer of Killers Ending Explained - Does It Set Up Prey 2? - IGN
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why do men say women hit the wall at 24?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
There's no international protocol on what to do if an asteroid strikes Earth - theregister.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Rory McIlroy makes an 8, barely breaks 80 in missing cut at RBC Canadian Open - NBC Sports
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
And-Ones: NBA On TNT, Offseason, Free Agents, Finals - Hoops Rumors
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sydney Sweeney visits Central NY, leads Boxing Hall of Fame parade (photos, video) - Syracuse.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.